If you don't see anything wrong with any of the stuff I just mentioned then I won't waste my time with this anymore. And I can keep going with all her ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥. How trans women are an insult to women's right because they are men benefiting from something women in the past had to fight for. She has extensively written in her blog about how transgender people fighting for equal rights jeopardize women status. She has claimed that most trans men are just women that transitioned to men in order to escape the sexism that women face. Rowling has liked tweets that literally called trans women men in dresses.

I've never been a fan of Rowling nor her Potterverse but I'm a member of several fantasy communities that like to be inclusive, so I'm somewhat familiar to the transphobic drama that surrounds Rowling which goes beyond a mere 'safe space for cis women'. You certainly can use your words to hurt, can you use them to explain your morals without being snarky and rude? The fact that you think the only issue people have with Rowling is that she wants women to have their own safe space is evidence of how ignorant you are about this topic. You seem to be on some moral high ground so I'll ask you.what is wrong with wanting biological women to have safe spaces if they feel they need them? No one (specifically Rowling) is saying that trans people shouldn't have the same assurance of safety, so why is that opinion so criticized? Originally posted by Mollerz:Yeah but we can let her know she's trash, and you can't buy your way out of yourself when you are garbage.

My post does not mention any defense for JK Rowling, it's just telling those who read the discussion that intellectual property is a thing so I don't know why I would buy it human decency aside. Let aside that there isn't anything even compelling to me in this game to begin with. I don't know why you want to defend her so badly to create this post to say hey, let's buy her stuff.

I do and I frankly don't want to spiral this conversation more by repeating it. Do you even know what the main story is said to be about? She hired on specifically people who fit her ideological view to make and develop this game. Not buying her things, means she doesn't get your money. The only thing she has ties to these days is twitter. So if you boycott any future Harry Potter games, tv shows or whatever, you will be missing out on some good content even though JK Rowling most likely won't have any involvement. Originally posted by Keagan:It's simple, she owns the Harry Potter IP which means she will always get royalties from it no matter what's being made with the IP.

Harry potter hogwarts legacy jk rowling